Pima vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,904,117 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.092% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 91.9 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $81,750, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $46,417, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,063, a difference of 0.75%), median earnings ($38,285 compared to $39,448, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $52,509, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 61.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 42.5%), and married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 0.49%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 42.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and male unemployment (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 25.6%), single father households (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 40.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 27.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.2%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.99%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.3%).