Immigrants from Australia vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,913,413 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.937. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.315% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 315.1 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $33,921, a difference of 70.9%), median family income ($126,620 compared to $82,386, a difference of 53.7%), and median household income ($102,562 compared to $67,792, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.0%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $46,417, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $52,509, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 109.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 98.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 92.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 36.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 36.9%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 41.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 88.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 88.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 68.3%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 66.6%), and births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 5.3%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 37.3%), no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 37.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 110.9%), master's degree (20.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 95.5%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 90.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 43.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.2%).