Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Micronesia
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,464,460 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.613% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 612.5 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $37,464, a difference of 38.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $80,544, a difference of 32.7%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $47,177, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $50,691, a difference of 7.2%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $61,000, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 11.5%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Tragic $37,464 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Tragic $90,345 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Tragic $75,574 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Tragic $41,133 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Tragic $47,177 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Tragic $35,477 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Tragic $50,691 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Tragic $80,544 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Tragic $87,864 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Average $61,000 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 40.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.1%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.8% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 20.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 15.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 18.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 23.0% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Tragic 18.6% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.5% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Average 17.6% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Fair 8.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Average 8.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Poor 5.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Tragic 78.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Exceptional 40.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 82.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 83.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.7%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Average 64.2% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Fair 27.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 44.9% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.32 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 45.6% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.0%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 12.3%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Good 10.1% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Good 90.1% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Fair 55.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 79.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 75.4%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 72.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Average 2.1% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.5% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Average 97.3% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Average 97.0% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Fair 95.9% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.6% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Fair 94.7% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Fair 93.5% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Poor 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Poor 90.6% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Poor 88.6% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Tragic 84.7% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Tragic 61.5% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Tragic 54.8% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Tragic 40.2% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 24.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 11.1%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.9%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 26.1% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 50.1% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.6% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |