Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,974,354 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.229% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 229.2 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,569 compared to $80,544, a difference of 16.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $87,864, a difference of 15.1%), and median household income ($86,255 compared to $75,574, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $61,000, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $50,691, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 23.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 9.1%), married-couple households (48.1% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.52%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.90%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 21.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 7th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 22.5%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.76%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 1.4%).