Northern European vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,790,407 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.554. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.057% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to a decrease of 57.1 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,698 compared to $37,464, a difference of 27.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,457 compared to $80,544, a difference of 24.7%), and median male earnings ($58,588 compared to $47,177, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $50,691, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,658 compared to $61,000, a difference of 6.0%), and median female earnings ($40,491 compared to $35,477, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 37.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.26%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 65.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.9%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 54.4%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 5.5%).