Slovak vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,680,330 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 26.3 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,306 compared to $47,177, a difference of 19.4%), wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and per capita income ($44,229 compared to $37,464, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $50,691, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $61,000, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($39,029 compared to $35,477, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.4%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.8%), single mother poverty (30.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and single male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.32, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.8%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 38.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 69.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.94%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and disability (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.3%).