Russian vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 434,687,303 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Africans within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 4.8 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $37,785, a difference of 40.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $78,986, a difference of 39.8%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $87,820, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $46,838, a difference of 16.1%), median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $36,530, a difference of 20.9%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 60.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 58.2%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 54.7%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 41.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 72.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 62.7%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 33.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.14%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 7.3%).