Latvian vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,697,241 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Africans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.279% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 279.4 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,785, a difference of 39.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $78,986, a difference of 37.9%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $87,820, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $46,838, a difference of 12.7%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $36,530, a difference of 20.3%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and African communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 66.3%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 65.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.3%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 54.7%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 43.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 70.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 64.3%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 33.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.2%).