Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,099,621 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.396% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 396.3 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,853 compared to $50,914, a difference of 21.6%), median family income ($95,647 compared to $114,826, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $111,454, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $51,737, a difference of 0.90%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $43,099, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $64,298, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.1%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.61%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (44.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 49.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.7%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.4%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.7%).