Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,604,410 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,131 compared to $50,914, a difference of 23.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $105,522, a difference of 20.2%), and wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $51,737, a difference of 0.79%), median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $43,099, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $64,298, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.9%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.70%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 37.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 5.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.6%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.7%).