Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Immigrants from Latvia

Fair
Excellent
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,397,041 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to an increase of 20.1 Immigrants from Latvia.
Yup'ik Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,518 compared to $50,914, a difference of 66.8%), median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $61,422, a difference of 55.5%), and median family income ($79,290 compared to $114,826, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $51,737, a difference of 5.8%), householder income over 65 years ($60,727 compared to $64,298, a difference of 5.9%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.5%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
Income MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Latvia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Exceptional
$50,914
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Exceptional
$114,826
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Exceptional
$93,602
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Exceptional
$51,555
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Exceptional
$61,422
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Exceptional
$43,099
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Fair
$51,737
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Exceptional
$105,522
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Exceptional
$111,454
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Exceptional
$64,298
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
26.7%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 215.9%), married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 196.9%), and single male poverty (31.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 159.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 17.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (27.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 32.5%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
10.3%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 255.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (14.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 224.6%), and male unemployment (16.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 219.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 63.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 77.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (9.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 80.9%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Latvia
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Good
5.4%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (76.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Latvia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 178.5%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 93.9%), and single mother households (10.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 82.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.4%), divorced or separated (10.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and family households (72.4% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 16.9%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Latvia
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Exceptional
29.1%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 279.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 50.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 49.5%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Latvia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
52.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.5%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 132.6%), master's degree (8.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 122.9%), and associate's degree (25.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 111.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.49%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.60%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Latvia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Exceptional
70.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
45.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.4%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 264.9%), hearing disability (5.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 86.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (37.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Latvia
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.4%