Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,775,441 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,165 compared to $50,914, a difference of 33.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $105,522, a difference of 30.5%), and wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $51,737, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $43,099, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $64,298, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 46.0%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.64%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 59.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.28%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 70.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.1%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.1%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and female disability (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.6%).