Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,915,491 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.834. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.531% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 530.5 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($98,205 compared to $114,826, a difference of 16.9%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $61,422, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $111,454, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $51,737, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $43,099, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.4%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.44%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.0%), family households (63.9% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.0%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%).