Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Immigrants from Latvia

Average
Excellent
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 8,877,750 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.248% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 247.8 Immigrants from Latvia.
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,344 compared to $50,914, a difference of 26.2%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $61,422, a difference of 25.8%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $51,555, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $51,737, a difference of 5.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $105,522, a difference of 7.9%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $43,099, a difference of 9.0%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
Income MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Latvia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Exceptional
$50,914
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Exceptional
$114,826
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Exceptional
$93,602
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Exceptional
$51,555
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Exceptional
$61,422
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Exceptional
$43,099
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Fair
$51,737
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Exceptional
$105,522
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Exceptional
$111,454
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Exceptional
$64,298
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
26.7%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 52.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 34.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.3%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 164.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 78.7%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Latvia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Good
5.4%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Latvia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
83.4%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 49.5%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 44.8%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Latvia
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
29.1%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 40.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.8%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Latvia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Tragic
52.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.5%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 83.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 69.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.24%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Latvia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Exceptional
70.1%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
45.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.4%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 94.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 65.2%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.73%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.7%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Latvia
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%