Immigrants from Belgium vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,664,729 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.163% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 162.6 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $64,298, a difference of 8.4%), and per capita income ($55,082 compared to $50,914, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,587 compared to $43,099, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $51,737, a difference of 6.0%), and median earnings ($54,679 compared to $51,555, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.2%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.62%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and family households (63.0% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.3%), professional degree (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.11%), 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%), female disability (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.41%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.8%).