Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,612,694 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $105,522, a difference of 13.2%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $51,737, a difference of 12.6%), and median household income ($105,262 compared to $93,602, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($53,874 compared to $50,914, a difference of 5.8%), and median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $61,422, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.0%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 15.2%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (48.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.2%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.4%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.70%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%).