Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,042,379 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 3.2 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 19.4%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $50,914, a difference of 19.3%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $61,422, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($93,933 compared to $93,602, a difference of 0.35%), householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $64,298, a difference of 0.77%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $105,522, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.6%), single father poverty (13.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.6%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.5%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.21%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 75.4%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 54.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 49.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 89.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.2%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.2%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.16%).