Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,382,517 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 3.2 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,979 compared to $50,914, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $51,737, a difference of 7.2%), and median family income ($108,570 compared to $114,826, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), median household income ($90,549 compared to $93,602, a difference of 3.4%), and median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $43,099, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 19.3%), male poverty (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.17%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in family households (65.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 5.3%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.77%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 42.8%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.9%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.81%).