Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,023,568 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.949. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 75.1 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $50,914, a difference of 75.4%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $114,826, a difference of 61.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $111,454, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 19.6%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $51,737, a difference of 22.1%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $43,099, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 162.8%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 139.1%), and male poverty (22.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 112.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 45.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 48.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 61.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 109.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 103.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 76.9%), single father households (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.0%), and single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households (66.4% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 49.8%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 103.2%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 102.0%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 91.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 54.3%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.6%).