Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,811,935 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.826. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 59.6 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,842 compared to $50,914, a difference of 34.5%), median family income ($91,763 compared to $114,826, a difference of 25.1%), and median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $43,099, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $51,737, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $61,422, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 27.5%), single father poverty (20.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty (13.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 58.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 26.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.6%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 38.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 28.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.4%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 96.5%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 77.4%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 57.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%).