Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,645,917 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 20.5 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,090 compared to $50,914, a difference of 15.5%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $61,422, a difference of 13.2%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $51,555, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $51,737, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $64,298, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.5%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.48%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.71%).