Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,685,410 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $64,298, a difference of 12.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $51,737, a difference of 10.3%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $93,602, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $61,422, a difference of 0.55%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $43,099, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 17.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.4%), single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.3%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 42.1%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.8%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.78%).