Laotian vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,232,311 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $50,914, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $51,737, a difference of 5.1%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $61,422, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $111,454, a difference of 0.36%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $105,522, a difference of 0.50%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.39%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.4%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.5%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.9%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.2%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.2%).