Immigrants from Egypt vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,454,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Egypt communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Egypt within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Egypt corresponds to an increase of 13.2 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,361 compared to $50,914, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,239 compared to $51,737, a difference of 4.8%), and median family income ($111,689 compared to $114,826, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,299 compared to $64,298, a difference of 0.0%), median household income ($93,700 compared to $93,602, a difference of 0.10%), and median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $43,099, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and single father poverty (14.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.3%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.0%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.27%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.0%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%).