Moroccan vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,379,697 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 61.8 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,138 compared to $111,454, a difference of 11.3%), and per capita income ($45,854 compared to $50,914, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,872 compared to $43,099, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,256 compared to $51,737, a difference of 2.9%), and median earnings ($48,838 compared to $51,555, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.7%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.19%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.7%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.17%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.79%).