Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,000,433 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.456. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 87.3 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $51,737, a difference of 7.3%), per capita income ($49,463 compared to $50,914, a difference of 2.9%), and median family income ($113,434 compared to $114,826, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $64,298, a difference of 0.25%), median earnings ($51,337 compared to $51,555, a difference of 0.42%), and median male earnings ($61,040 compared to $61,422, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 13.4%), male poverty (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and poverty (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.35%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.7%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.18%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.8%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%).