Comanche vs Bhutanese Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Comanche
Bhutanese
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Comanche
Bhutanese
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Bhutanese Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,476,327 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 389,900,258 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.295 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 6.8%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 9.4% | 19.5% |
Range | 8.2% | 19.1% |
Mean | 5.0% | 5.1% |
Median | 4.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 6.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Chickasaw (4.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Osage (4.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Congo (4.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Belgian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Cambodian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Palestinian (5.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Palestinians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Nepalese | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Ugandans | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.1% |