Immigrants from Guatemala vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,457,319 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.652. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 51.2 Sri Lankans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $101,960, a difference of 25.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $108,270, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $108,234, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $55,470, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $40,496, a difference of 14.3%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 44.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 44.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.7%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 29.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (65.0% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.4%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.3%).