Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Sri Lankans

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sri Lankan Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,643,686 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 47.5 Sri Lankans.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($61,663 compared to $93,093, a difference of 51.0%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $108,234, a difference of 49.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $101,960, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 16.6%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $40,496, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $55,470, a difference of 22.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamSri Lankan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Average
$44,014
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$108,234
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$93,093
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$48,040
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Excellent
$56,136
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Excellent
$40,496
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$55,470
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$101,960
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$108,270
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$64,201
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Average
25.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 141.2%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 121.1%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 115.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 54.7%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 55.5%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 61.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamSri Lankan
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
26.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Fair
12.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 101.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 95.7%), and male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 95.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamSri Lankan
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 9.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamSri Lankan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Fair
74.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 72.3%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 62.5%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 0.88%), average family size (3.53 compared to 3.35, a difference of 5.4%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamSri Lankan
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
67.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.35
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
28.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 105.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 24.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamSri Lankan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 56.3%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 51.7%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.5% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.50%), 9th grade (92.6% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and 7th grade (95.0% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.68%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamSri Lankan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
95.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
94.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
94.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
90.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
84.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Average
65.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Average
38.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 91.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 64.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 17.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sri Lankan Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamSri Lankan
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
48.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Excellent
2.4%