Immigrants from North America vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 393,969,027 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Immigrant from North America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North America corresponds to an increase of 56.9 Sri Lankans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,302 compared to $44,014, a difference of 12.0%), wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and median male earnings ($60,265 compared to $56,136, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,407 compared to $101,960, a difference of 0.44%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,198 compared to $108,270, a difference of 0.86%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,856 compared to $64,201, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.51%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 11.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (48.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 28.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 85.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 26.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.4%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.44%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 4.0%).