Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,787,557 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 15.8 Sri Lankans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,316 compared to $44,014, a difference of 12.0%), median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $56,136, a difference of 8.6%), and median earnings ($51,624 compared to $48,040, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($93,051 compared to $93,093, a difference of 0.050%), householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $55,470, a difference of 0.18%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $108,270, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.9%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (48.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 79.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 54.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 35.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.4%).