Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,382,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Immigrants from Austria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $52,400, a difference of 6.7%), median earnings ($54,938 compared to $51,826, a difference of 6.0%), and median female earnings ($45,323 compared to $42,824, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.92%), per capita income ($53,359 compared to $52,503, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $68,208, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 16.4%), single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.40%), poverty (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 8.7%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple households (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and family households (63.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.86%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.1%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.8%).