Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,981,897 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 25.9 Immigrants from Austria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,412 compared to $52,503, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,952 compared to $68,208, a difference of 5.0%), and median family income ($112,374 compared to $116,830, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $52,400, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($60,388 compared to $62,164, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.17%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.45%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (48.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.7%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 1.7%).