French American Indian vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,590,442 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Immigrants from Austria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $52,503, a difference of 30.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $113,140, a difference of 26.0%), and median family income ($92,872 compared to $116,830, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $52,400, a difference of 7.0%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $42,824, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.1%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.4%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 60.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 54.6%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.0%).