Iroquois vs Bermudan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bermudan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Bermudans

Fair
Fair
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,838
SOCIAL INDEX
25.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
241st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bermudan Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,054,543 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.992. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.527% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 526.6 Bermudans.
Iroquois Integration in Bermudan Communities

Iroquois vs Bermudan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $42,911, a difference of 9.7%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,418, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,359, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $88,231, a difference of 5.4%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $52,465, a difference of 6.3%).
Iroquois vs Bermudan Income
Income MetricIroquoisBermudan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Fair
$42,911
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$97,577
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$80,406
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Fair
$45,593
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Poor
$52,465
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Fair
$39,418
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$47,359
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$88,231
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$94,197
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$58,171
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
23.1%

Iroquois vs Bermudan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.7%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.38%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Iroquois vs Bermudan Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisBermudan
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
21.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.0%

Iroquois vs Bermudan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Iroquois vs Bermudan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisBermudan
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.1%

Iroquois vs Bermudan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Iroquois vs Bermudan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisBermudan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Excellent
83.1%

Iroquois vs Bermudan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.3%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.3%).
Iroquois vs Bermudan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisBermudan
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
42.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
43.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
35.5%

Iroquois vs Bermudan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.5%).
Iroquois vs Bermudan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisBermudan
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
12.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
87.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.6%

Iroquois vs Bermudan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Iroquois vs Bermudan Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisBermudan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Good
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Average
85.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Average
65.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Average
59.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Average
46.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Good
15.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Average
1.8%

Iroquois vs Bermudan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Iroquois vs Bermudan Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisBermudan
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Excellent
46.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%