Czech vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,452,476 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.726. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 77.4 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $52,649, a difference of 18.1%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $120,301, a difference of 13.7%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $97,311, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $67,326, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 10.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.1%), male poverty (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.5%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.12%), family households (64.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 42.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%).