Comanche vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Latvian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Latvians
6.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,532,955 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,282,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 53.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Latvian |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 0.39% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 26.5% |
| Range | 46.6% | 26.1% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 4.8% |
| Median | 6.0% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Somalia (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), African (6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Western Asia (6.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Bangladeshi (6.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |