Panamanian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,413,493 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 63.6 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,035 compared to $52,649, a difference of 25.3%), median family income ($97,683 compared to $120,301, a difference of 23.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,193 compared to $108,926, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,611 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $43,941, a difference of 12.5%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 43.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 42.8%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.24%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.1%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.7%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 23.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 55.5%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 50.8%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.6%).