Immigrants from Japan vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,360,713 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $52,783, a difference of 6.0%), median earnings ($54,938 compared to $53,001, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $67,326, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.030%), per capita income ($53,359 compared to $52,649, a difference of 1.3%), and median family income ($122,764 compared to $120,301, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.95%), receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.0%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.44%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.4%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.70%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%).