Samoan vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Samoan
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Samoans
Latvians
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Samoan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,980,550 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.794. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 9.7 Latvians.
Samoan vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $52,649, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $63,498, a difference of 23.6%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $53,001, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $67,326, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Samoan | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,826 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,344 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,498 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,206 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,389 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,498 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,610 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,385 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,580 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,427 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.0% | Tragic 27.9% |
Samoan vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Poverty Metric | Samoan | Latvian |
Poverty | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Good 20.6% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.8% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Samoan vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Samoan | Latvian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoan vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Samoan | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.5% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.3% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.3% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Samoan vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.8%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Samoan | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.9% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.5% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.42 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.6% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Samoan vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 50.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Samoan | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 25.0% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.2% | Fair 6.1% |
Samoan vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 87.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 81.2%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
Education Level Metric | Samoan | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.0% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.1% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Samoan vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | Samoan | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.5% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |