Seminole vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Seminole
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Seminole

Latvians

Poor
Exceptional
2,239
SOCIAL INDEX
19.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
265th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Seminole Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,519,530 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Seminole communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Seminole corresponds to a decrease of 26.4 Latvians.
Seminole Integration in Latvian Communities

Seminole vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Seminole and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,180 compared to $52,649, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,077 compared to $115,957, a difference of 44.8%), and median family income ($83,354 compared to $120,301, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,649 compared to $52,783, a difference of 15.6%), and median female earnings ($34,385 compared to $43,941, a difference of 27.8%).
Seminole vs Latvian Income
Income MetricSeminoleLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,180
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,354
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,420
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,233
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,783
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,385
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,649
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,584
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,077
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,373
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.6%
Tragic
27.9%

Seminole vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Seminole and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 68.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 64.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.6%).
Seminole vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricSeminoleLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.0%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.8%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.1%

Seminole vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Seminole and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%).
Seminole vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSeminoleLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.1%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Seminole vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Seminole and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.4%).
Seminole vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSeminoleLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.5%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.1%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.1%
Exceptional
83.8%

Seminole vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Seminole and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.9%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 36.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.3%).
Seminole vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSeminoleLatvian
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
27.7%

Seminole vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.8%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.4%).
Seminole vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSeminoleLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Fair
6.1%

Seminole vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Seminole and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 95.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 93.6%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Seminole vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricSeminoleLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Seminole vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 55.9%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.5%).
Seminole vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricSeminoleLatvian
Disability
Tragic
14.9%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%