Potawatomi vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Latvians

Fair
Exceptional
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,066,690 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 39.5 Latvians.
Potawatomi Integration in Latvian Communities

Potawatomi vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,046 compared to $52,649, a difference of 38.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $115,957, a difference of 37.0%), and median family income ($88,265 compared to $120,301, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.53%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $52,783, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $67,326, a difference of 24.2%).
Potawatomi vs Latvian Income
Income MetricPotawatomiLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.9%

Potawatomi vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 44.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 44.8%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father poverty (18.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.8%).
Potawatomi vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Exceptional
9.1%

Potawatomi vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Potawatomi vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiLatvian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%

Potawatomi vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Potawatomi vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
83.8%

Potawatomi vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 30.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.9%).
Potawatomi vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiLatvian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Exceptional
27.7%

Potawatomi vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.7%).
Potawatomi vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
6.1%

Potawatomi vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 75.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 65.0%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Potawatomi vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Potawatomi vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 45.1%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.5%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 8.7%).
Potawatomi vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiLatvian
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%