Kiowa vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,716,458 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.811. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 46.5 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $115,957, a difference of 55.0%), per capita income ($35,102 compared to $52,649, a difference of 50.0%), and median family income ($80,885 compared to $120,301, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $52,783, a difference of 18.0%), wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $43,941, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 75.1%), family poverty (12.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 73.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 13.9%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 50.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 55.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.1%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 102.5%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 83.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 70.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.4%).