South American Indian vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

South American Indians

Latvians

Average
Exceptional
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in South American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,947,426 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.202% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 202.1 Latvians.
South American Indian Integration in Latvian Communities

South American Indian vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,206 compared to $52,649, a difference of 19.1%), median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $63,498, a difference of 16.5%), and median family income ($103,624 compared to $120,301, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.37%), householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $67,326, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $43,941, a difference of 9.8%).
South American Indian vs Latvian Income
Income MetricSouth American IndianLatvian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,206
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Good
$103,624
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,446
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Good
$46,952
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,508
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,019
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,979
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,497
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,171
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,215
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
27.9%

South American Indian vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.7%), receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.3%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
South American Indian vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricSouth American IndianLatvian
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Fair
11.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Exceptional
9.1%

South American Indian vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
South American Indian vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSouth American IndianLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%

South American Indian vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
South American Indian vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSouth American IndianLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
83.8%

South American Indian vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.7%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (64.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
South American Indian vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSouth American IndianLatvian
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Exceptional
27.7%

South American Indian vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.95%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
South American Indian vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSouth American IndianLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Fair
6.1%

South American Indian vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.1%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
South American Indian vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricSouth American IndianLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.5%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.0%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.3%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.9%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
2.6%

South American Indian vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.33%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
South American Indian vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricSouth American IndianLatvian
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.1%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%