Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,500,384 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 99.3 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $108,926, a difference of 50.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $115,957, a difference of 48.9%), and per capita income ($35,720 compared to $52,649, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $52,783, a difference of 22.0%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $43,941, a difference of 28.1%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 71.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 68.1%), and family poverty (11.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.0%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 53.6%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (59.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.36%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 71.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.6%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.6%).