Moroccan vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Moroccan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Moroccans

Latvians

Fair
Exceptional
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Moroccan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,177,832 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Latvians.
Moroccan Integration in Latvian Communities

Moroccan vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 16.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,138 compared to $115,957, a difference of 15.8%), and median family income ($104,488 compared to $120,301, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,256 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.90%), median female earnings ($41,872 compared to $43,941, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($48,838 compared to $53,001, a difference of 8.5%).
Moroccan vs Latvian Income
Income MetricMoroccanLatvian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,854
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Good
$104,488
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Good
$86,468
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,838
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,499
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,872
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,256
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,117
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,138
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,683
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Tragic
27.9%

Moroccan vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.4%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.0%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Moroccan vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricMoroccanLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.1%

Moroccan vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.3%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.7%).
Moroccan vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMoroccanLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Moroccan vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Moroccan vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMoroccanLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.7%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Exceptional
83.8%

Moroccan vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.5%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.8%).
Moroccan vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMoroccanLatvian
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.22
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.8%
Exceptional
27.7%

Moroccan vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 49.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 21.4%).
Moroccan vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMoroccanLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.4%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.8%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.9%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.9%
Fair
6.1%

Moroccan vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%).
Moroccan vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricMoroccanLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.2%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.5%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.6%

Moroccan vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.65%), male disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%).
Moroccan vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricMoroccanLatvian
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%