Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Belize
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Belize

Latvians

Tragic
Exceptional
1,058
SOCIAL INDEX
8.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
323rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Immigrants from Belize Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,683,615 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Belize communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belize within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belize corresponds to an increase of 10.8 Latvians.
Immigrants from Belize Integration in Latvian Communities

Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,614 compared to $52,649, a difference of 36.3%), median family income ($89,197 compared to $120,301, a difference of 34.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,229 compared to $115,957, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,223 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.0%), median female earnings ($37,056 compared to $43,941, a difference of 18.6%), and median earnings ($42,339 compared to $53,001, a difference of 25.2%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BelizeLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,614
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$89,197
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,938
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,339
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,809
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,056
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,223
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,141
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,229
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,665
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Tragic
27.9%

Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 71.8%), receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 67.0%), and family poverty (11.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.55%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and single male poverty (13.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BelizeLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.7%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BelizeLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BelizeLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.8%

Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.0%), births to unmarried women (37.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.3%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BelizeLatvian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.39
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.3%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 56.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.30%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BelizeLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.4%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
49.9%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Fair
6.1%

Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 98.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 94.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 80.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BelizeLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.4%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.9%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.1%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 21.7%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%), male disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BelizeLatvian
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.6%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%