Mexican vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,577,598 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.453. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,559 compared to $52,649, a difference of 52.3%), median family income ($85,618 compared to $120,301, a difference of 40.5%), and median male earnings ($46,147 compared to $63,498, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,989 compared to $52,783, a difference of 5.6%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,897 compared to $67,326, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 84.1%), family poverty (11.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 66.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and single male poverty (14.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.7%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and currently married (45.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.0%), no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 127.1%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 120.0%), and no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 113.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 28.1%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.7%).