Crow vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,423,625 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.308. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 23.6 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $52,649, a difference of 65.9%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $120,301, a difference of 57.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $115,957, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $52,783, a difference of 12.3%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $43,941, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $67,326, a difference of 36.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 145.2%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 127.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 113.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 43.7%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 47.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 47.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 275.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 242.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 237.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 75.2%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 45.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (65.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 97.7%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 86.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.30%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 43.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.9%).