Hopi vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hopi
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hopi
Latvians
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Hopi Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,003,632 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Hopi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hopi corresponds to an increase of 16.9 Latvians.
Hopi vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hopi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,177 compared to $52,649, a difference of 68.9%), median family income ($77,188 compared to $120,301, a difference of 55.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,562 compared to $115,957, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,978 compared to $52,783, a difference of 12.4%), median female earnings ($33,932 compared to $43,941, a difference of 29.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,925 compared to $67,326, a difference of 32.2%).
Income Metric | Hopi | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,177 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,188 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $65,043 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,871 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,060 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,932 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,978 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $75,002 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,562 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,925 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 27.9% |
Hopi vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hopi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 136.3%), family poverty (15.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 125.0%), and male poverty (20.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 117.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 28.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 44.8%), and single female poverty (28.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 47.7%).
Poverty Metric | Hopi | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.7% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 27.5% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.0% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 27.2% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Hopi vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hopi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (16.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 147.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (11.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 139.0%), and male unemployment (10.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 122.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Hopi | Latvian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 30.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.3% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Hopi vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hopi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (66.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (76.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 11.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hopi | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 58.4% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 71.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 66.0% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.5% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.3% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 77.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Hopi vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hopi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (50.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 83.3%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 60.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.0%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Hopi | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.60 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 50.8% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Hopi vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hopi | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.7% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.4% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 49.0% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Fair 6.1% |
Hopi vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hopi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 82.3%), bachelor's degree (25.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 82.2%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 71.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Hopi | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.1% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.9% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 34.6% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Hopi vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 252.8%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.8%).
Disability Metric | Hopi | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 4.6% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.5% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.0% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.9% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |